GTtoo wrote:
Although the new assembly through the original eyelette is super steardy and secure, and would need some pretty serious shunting to move anything, I realise now the eye was originally intended for a clip on belt end as shown by JT191, which could swivell around in any direction. Definitely no add ons or welding to the eyelette, out of the question !!
Thanks for shining more light on the topic guys.
B.
This topic has been in the back of my mind for a while.
Something occurred to me the other day. I have been spending several days welding together 26 Gemini rear lower control arms from scratch (because unbent used ones are a little uncommon) and rehabbing and rewelding another 15 used control arms that I managed to hammer back into straight. I do a heck of a lot better job than the original Japanese computerized machine weld, and my control arms aren't filled with some Japanese worker's cigarette butts that he wants to hide from his supervisor while he smokes on the job.
No one says anything about me or anyone else welding together our own suspension arms, which see many times more force on a daily basis than a seat belt mount sees in a crash. But there is a big stink if we apply the same workmanship we use to make suspension arms that handle high G cornering loads on a race track, to securing a seat belt to a car.
From the standpoint of not wanting to be sued or locked up, we can't suggest anything other than what's legal. But from the standpoint of reality, just about anything we build will probably live through the worst possible accident while the rest of the car disintegrates around what we built.