|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
Theoretic Technical question about gearbox...
Author |
Message |
Nappe1
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 11:21 pm Posts: 46 Location: Kotka, Finland
Car(s): '10 Toyota Yaris 1.33 l
|
Hi, As I am now finalizing one version of that GT Legends simulation version of GT-R, I am trying to make it as competitive as possible. For this I have been making gearbox and right now it looks like this:
input / drop gear ratio: (20/27)
1st: (19/35) --> 2.487 2nd: (21/26) --> 1.671 3rd: (25/23) --> 1.242 4th: (27/20) --> 1.0
and for the final gear driver / player has full range to choose from: (8/37) --> 4.625 (10/43) --> 4.30 (9/37) --> 4.11 (10/41) --> 4.00 (9/34) --> 3.778 (11/41) --> 3.727
...and this is from PR91W homologation as alternative gear set. However Bellett 1600GTs in thier different forms (PR90, PR91) also have homologated two more sets, which have input ratio of 19/28.
So, can you change the input gears without changing the layshaft and inputshaft in bellett? My knowledge is rather limited here, I do know that in Mini you can change the "drop gears" which change the ratio of input and layshaft, but Mini differs a lot from Front Engine, Real Wheel Drive cars.
and if you can, is the car stil valid for Group 2 historics as the homologation does not mention this combination?
|
Sun Jan 06, 2013 2:15 pm |
|
|
dave
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2008 9:15 am Posts: 1991
Car(s): 1965 Wasp, 1966 Bellett, 1967 Bellett, 1969 Florian, 1973 Bellett GTR, 1976 Buick Opel by Isuzu, 1978 Gemini van
|
Hey surely someone can help Nappe1 out with this?
I've not pulled any of my cars apart enough to know the answer!
Anyone?
Cheers,
Dave
_________________My latest automotive articles and original content shared here:https://www.facebook.com/garageofawesomeStreet Machine! Unique Cars! Awesome!
|
Thu Jan 10, 2013 9:53 pm |
|
|
Glenn
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 2:23 am Posts: 2823 Location: Melb.
Car(s): '72 Sport Bellett (imported 180912), M/B AMG A35, i30, had Belletts in past, 2 sed, 3 GT's.
|
my PR60 Sports lists as follows:
1 3.207 2 1.989 3 1.356 4 1.00 Rev 3.5962
Diff 3.727
I have no idea though what can be done in changing gearsets.
Can anybody tell me how my ratios compare to a 1600 GT ?
_________________ '72 PR60 Sport
|
Thu Jan 10, 2013 10:58 pm |
|
|
JT191
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:05 am Posts: 543 Location: 12,450 miles away from the Big Warehouse in Melbourne
|
Specs for GTs: http://www.isuzuperformance.com/isupage ... belgt.htmlQuote: September 1969 - September 1973 Bellett 1600 GT PR91W
Gear Ratios First 3.467 Second 1.989 Third 1.356 Fourth 1.000
Axle Ratio Final Drive Ratio 3.727
|
Thu Jan 10, 2013 11:20 pm |
|
|
Glenn
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 2:23 am Posts: 2823 Location: Melb.
Car(s): '72 Sport Bellett (imported 180912), M/B AMG A35, i30, had Belletts in past, 2 sed, 3 GT's.
|
interesting, only a 1st gear ratio change on the so-called 'close ratio' GT box. Some interesting info in the link too. I was under the impression that the later cars like my 72, used unleaded fuel. Anybody know the fuel situation in Japan at that time ?
_________________ '72 PR60 Sport
|
Fri Jan 11, 2013 12:15 am |
|
|
JT191
Joined: Wed Sep 24, 2008 10:05 am Posts: 543 Location: 12,450 miles away from the Big Warehouse in Melbourne
|
Glenn wrote: I was under the impression that the later cars like my 72, used unleaded fuel. Anybody know the fuel situation in Japan at that time ? I ran a couple searches... One page said unleaded was first introduced in Japan in April of 1972. Another said they began refining unleaded in Japan in 1975. So maybe the "introduced" gas was imported? The last said that unleaded became widely available in Japan in 1976. Designed-for and capable-of-running-on might be two different things, if they switched over the rings and seals a few years early, anticipating the change. The 1969 161SS engine appears to be leaded only. Or someone upstream seemed sure, since it included jugs of lead additive.
|
Fri Jan 11, 2013 5:06 am |
|
|
Glenn
Joined: Tue May 10, 2011 2:23 am Posts: 2823 Location: Melb.
Car(s): '72 Sport Bellett (imported 180912), M/B AMG A35, i30, had Belletts in past, 2 sed, 3 GT's.
|
JT191 wrote: Glenn wrote: I was under the impression that the later cars like my 72, used unleaded fuel. Anybody know the fuel situation in Japan at that time ? I ran a couple searches... One page said unleaded was first introduced in Japan in April of 1972. Another said they began refining unleaded in Japan in 1975. So maybe the "introduced" gas was imported? The last said that unleaded became widely available in Japan in 1976. Designed-for and capable-of-running-on might be two different things, if they switched over the rings and seals a few years early, anticipating the change. The 1969 161SS engine appears to be leaded only. Or someone upstream seemed sure, since it included jugs of lead additive. I can't figure anythiong from the japanese owners manual I have for the PR60. so could well be leaded then. Most of us here run 98 octane unleaded (no leaded freely available here) Some use a lead replacment additive i think. If an engine was to be re-built most would have hardened valve seats fiited. Or, like most of us, with very low milage per year, just accept unleaded. glenn
_________________ '72 PR60 Sport
|
Fri Jan 11, 2013 9:35 am |
|
|
Nappe1
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2008 11:21 pm Posts: 46 Location: Kotka, Finland
Car(s): '10 Toyota Yaris 1.33 l
|
Actually, this is the standard street box for GTR. homologation document (for PR91W) knows another, much closer ratio alternative box, which was most likely used for factory racing cars in the late 60's - early 70's: 1st: 2.487 2nd: 1.671 3rd: 1.242 4th: 1.0 for PR90, there's huge selection of gearsets in homologation documents: in 1964 homologated gear sets: Code: *** set1 set2 set3 set4 1st 3.444 3.444 3.17 3.05 2nd 2.133 1.82 1.96 1.89 3rd 1.387 1.28 1.276 1.33 4th 1 1 1 1
and in 1966 they homologated PR90 again, this time with just two gear sets: Code: *** set1 set2 1st 3,444 3,444 2nd 2,133 1,82 3rd 1,387 1,28 4th 1 1
so, if your PR90 is 1965 or earlier, and you are in to historic racing, you have 2 valid gear sets more than if the car is from 1966. (not to mention that most likely it will end up in class where cars are from 1966 to 1970, making the opposition much more faster...) ...from PR91 I have only homologation documents from 1969, in which it declares two gearsets: Code: *** set1 set2 1st 3,207 2,487 2nd 1,989 1,671 3rd 1,356 1,242 4th 1 1
...and from same year, PR91W homologation, it's same two as the PR91: Code: *** set1 set2 1st 3,207 2,487 2nd 1,989 1,671 3rd 1,356 1,242 4th 1 1
I do know that 1800GT was also homologated, but I don't have the documents. It would be interesting to see, if the higher low end torque has made any changes to gear ratios... If you look at the exact tooth counts (if you have the homologation docs or the gearbox spec sheets, I am a bit lazy to write it all here... you see the toothcounts of ultra short box in my first post as example.), the differences between the sets aren't really big and technically, all these (excluding the ultra short one starting with 1st being 2.487) use rather small different set of physical gears inside the box. I am working hard to get some version of the GT Legends simulation car done before next season in our online championship racing series starts in Melbourne mid march and hopefully Isuzu natches few drivers to drive the car. What comes to my original question, I got that figured out; the input ratios most likely are not interchangeable, but you need to change all gearbox shafts (input shaft, lay shaft and output shaft) at once.
|
Wed Jan 16, 2013 8:46 pm |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 8 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 84 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
|